# Project Status > **What this page is.** The honest, dated state of the project: what works > today, what is in progress, and what is not started. It is refreshed > periodically and each claim maps to a maintained document in the repository. > Canonical sources: [`../docs/README.md`](../docs/README.md) (project front > door), [`../docs/04-implementation/01-known-knowns-and-unknowns.md`](../docs/04-implementation/01-known-knowns-and-unknowns.md) > (known-knowns and known-unknowns) and > [`../docs/04-implementation/03-execution-frontier.md`](../docs/04-implementation/03-execution-frontier.md) > (the execution frontier). When this page and the docs disagree, the docs tree > wins. Status: 2026-10-12, tree `master @ 2f066727`. Tags: `[live]` proven with the stock guest driver; `[gated]` implemented, default-off or behind supervised gates; `[wip]` partially implemented; `[wall]` current blocker; `[target]` named success state; `[planned]` designed, not built. ## 1. Milestone ladder | Milestone | State | |---|---| | Emulated vGPU device (PCI, BARs, MSI-X, VFIO mdev) | `[live]` working | | GSP boot emulation (FWSEC / booter / RISCV handshake) | `[live]` working | | GSP-RM message queues and RPC transport | `[live]` working | | Stock guest driver probe and `nvidia-smi` (TU104) | `[live]` working | | CUDA userspace init and the driver-API smoke (`cuInit`, device enumeration, `cuCtxCreate`, allocation, copies, free, destroy) | `[live]` working — the smoke prints `ALL OK` and the 64-byte payload round-trips exactly | | Guest CUDA kernel execution on real hardware | `[wall]` a forwarded guest launch reaches the engine queue (the front end deposits the methods and the scheduling path accepts them), but the engine does not yet execute the forwarded launch descriptor — an engine-authored release has not been observed. Emulation-mode kernel runs (executed through the host bridge on a no-claim path) have completed green; reproducibility of the green path across boots is an open issue | | Physical backend on real hardware (module-owned GPU running its real GSP-RM) | `[live]` boot, RPC session, object creation and copy-engine work proven; GR execution is the same frontier as above | | Multi-tenant isolation (mdev per VM, per-context page directories) | `[wip]` designed; the baseline service-state ownership work is in progress | | OpenGL / Vulkan (3D), video | `[planned]` | | Windows guests | `[planned]` (target) | | Xen / Argo / OpenXT / Qubes Air transports | `[planned]` (the emulation core is hypervisor-independent by construction) | | Live migration | `[planned]` | | Performance numbers | `[planned]` — no published numbers yet; any claim will ship with its measurement methodology | ## 2. What "CUDA works" means here A green `nvidia-smi` or even a passing driver-API smoke is not "CUDA works". The project's definition of done for CUDA requires all of the following ([`../docs/04-implementation/01-known-knowns-and-unknowns.md`](../docs/04-implementation/01-known-knowns-and-unknowns.md)): 1. Stock guest driver probe, `nvidia-smi`, device enumeration — done. 2. Context creation and the full driver-API surface (`cuMemAlloc`, copies, free, destroy) — done. 3. A guest kernel launch that **executes on real hardware** and is proven by an engine-authored completion — the current frontier. 4. Memory the guest's work refers to resolving correctly end to end (the VA↔PA model) — partially, for the paths exercised so far. 5. Correct completion, semaphore and fault semantics back to the guest — CE class work has the relay; GR is open. 6. Reproducibility: every boot, not a lucky one — an open issue. 7. No ad-hoc default-off parameters required for the canonical path. Until every gate holds, the honest formulation is: **initialization and the driver-API path work; engine execution is in progress.** ## 3. How to see it yourself The reference setup takes about half an hour from a fresh host ([`Install-and-First-Run.md`](Install-and-First-Run.md)); the current expected outcome is exactly the ladder above — driver probe, `nvidia-smi`, the full driver-API smoke, and the execution frontier where it stands. The risc-v-gsp-rm-debugger workbench ([`Riscv-GSP-RM-Debugger.md`](Riscv-GSP-RM-Debugger.md)) is the host-side tooling used to study the firmware side of that frontier. ## 4. How this page is maintained Every claim above carries a date and a tag, maps to a maintained document in the repository, and is refreshed as milestones land. The execution story, with its evidence and its open theories, is on [`Execution-Frontier.md`](Execution-Frontier.md). ## 5. Related pages * [`Install-and-First-Run.md`](Install-and-First-Run.md) * [`System-Overview.md`](System-Overview.md) * [`Execution-Frontier.md`](Execution-Frontier.md) * [`Hardware-Software-Matrix.md`](Hardware-Software-Matrix.md) — which hardware and software combinations are Reference, Target or Experimental. * [`FAQ.md`](FAQ.md)