# FAQ > **What this page is.** The questions the project is asked most, answered > honestly and with pointers to the maintained documents. Condensed from > [`../docs/09-reference/glossary-and-faq.md`](../docs/09-reference/glossary-and-faq.md); > the docs tree wins on disagreement. Status: 2026-10-12, tree `master @ 2f066727`. ## Project and positioning **Is this a replacement for vLLM on bare metal?** No. Continuous batching on a bare-metal host is the right answer for centralized inference, and it stays that way. Open-IOV is for compute *inside guests*: Linux and Windows CUDA, 3D, video, and secure edge isolation. **Does the guest driver need to be patched?** No, and that is a hard project rule: no guest driver patches, no host driver patches, no firmware patches, no hypervisor patches. The guest runs the stock NVIDIA driver, unmodified. **Does the host driver need to be patched or replaced?** No. In the standalone configuration the distribution driver owns the physical GPU and Open-IOV is an independent kernel module. Building NVIDIA's OpenRM modules from source is needed only for the native vGPU-management workflows, not for the QEMU/emulated path ([`Install-and-First-Run.md`](Install-and-First-Run.md) §2). **Why is `nvidia-smi` working but my CUDA kernel not running?** Because execution is the frontier, not the setup. Today, a stock guest driver probes, `nvidia-smi` works, device enumeration works, and the full CUDA **driver-API** path (context creation, allocation, copies, free, destroy) completes; a guest **kernel launch** is forwarded to the physical engine queue but the engine does not yet execute the forwarded launch descriptor (`[wall]`). This is the project's known status, not a misconfiguration — see [`Project-Status.md`](Project-Status.md) and [`Execution-Frontier.md`](Execution-Frontier.md). **How fast is it?** No published numbers yet. Copy-engine-class forwarding and its completion and fault relay are implemented (default off) and GR execution is the open frontier; even the initialization path has not yet been measured under the project's methodology. Any performance claim will ship together with its methodology and measurements. ## Compatibility **Will it support Windows guests?** Yes, it is a target: same architecture, measured bring-up. [`Hardware-Software-Matrix.md`](Hardware-Software-Matrix.md) lists the support ladder. **Can I run several VMs on one GPU?** That is a core design goal: one mediated device per VM, IOMMU isolation, and explicit scheduling at the GPU's memory-management unit. Multi-tenant maturity depends on the scheduling and isolation work tracked in the project's known-unknowns document. **Does it support Xen / Qubes OS Air / Argo / OpenXT?** Designed for them. The emulation core is hypervisor-independent by construction; the transport backends are on the roadmap. KVM/QEMU with VFIO mdev is the reference transport today. **What about MIG?** MIG is a hardware partitioning mechanism; the project's scheduling policy can use it where available. It is part of the multi-tenancy work. **Which GPUs are supported?** Turing TU104 is the reference platform. Other generations are targets or experimental combinations — see [`Hardware-Software-Matrix.md`](Hardware-Software-Matrix.md) for the exact ladder and what each status means. ## Legal and licensing **How is this legal / license-clean?** Open-IOV's own code is BSD-3-Clause (GPL-2.0 for the kernel modules that link GPL-only kernel exports); NVIDIA's software is used unmodified and is not redistributed. The project interoperates with the interfaces rather than relicensing anything. Details: the repository `LICENSE` and the legal reference in `docs/09-reference/`. **Can my company use this commercially?** Yes, under BSD-3-Clause (kernel modules GPL-2.0), with no fee. Co-development is welcome — see [`HAAEEP-and-Collaboration.md`](HAAEEP-and-Collaboration.md). ## Contributing **Where do I report bugs or ask for help?** Open an issue in the repository with a reproduction and the standard captures (host dmesg, guest dmesg, guest `lspci -vvv`, guest driver parameters). A reproduction plus logs is worth more than a description. **How do I contribute support for my GPU / driver / hypervisor?** Start from [`Hardware-Software-Matrix.md`](Hardware-Software-Matrix.md) and the portability workflow in the repository. The deliverable is a profile plus evidence from the project's evaluation ladder. **How do I debug the firmware side?** The risc-v-gsp-rm-debugger workbench runs GSP firmware in a RISC-V virtual machine with hooks, watchpoints and recorded sessions — [`Riscv-GSP-RM-Debugger.md`](Riscv-GSP-RM-Debugger.md).